From Experience to Knowledge: A Narrative-Reflective Protocol for Making Teachers Professional Knowledge Observable in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
Over the past decades, research on inclusive education has primarily focused on students with disabilities, while considerably less attention has been devoted to teachers living with visible or non-visible disabilities. At the same time, the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence has opened new perspectives for educational research, mainly supporting teaching and learning processes. However, its potential as a methodological device capable of fostering narrative reflexivity and making embodied professional knowledge observable remains largely unexplored.
This paper presents a theoretical and methodological framework developed within an ongoing doctoral research project aimed at designing a Narrative-Reflective Protocol for teachers with disabilities. The protocol integrates Narrative Inquiry, Disability Studies, Embodied Education, and professional reflexivity, introducing the construct of the Second Narrative Reader, a role assigned to generative artificial intelligence that provides participants with structured reflective feedback on their narratives without replacing human interpretation.
The underlying theoretical assumption is that the professional knowledge developed through the lived experience of disability often remains tacit and is difficult to document through conventional qualitative research methods. The dialogical feedback generated by the Second Narrative Reader is intended to foster a process of re-narration in which participants are encouraged to confirm, expand, or reinterpret the meaning of their professional experience. Consequently, the research data do not consist of the AI-generated output itself, but rather of the narrative transformations emerging from the comparison between the initial narrative and its subsequent re-elaboration by the participant.
The paper illustrates the theoretical rationale underpinning the protocol, presents the N.A.R.R.A.T.E. framework as its interpretative model, and describes the methodological design of the research. Finally, it discusses the potential implications of this proposal for narrative inquiry, teacher education, and the development of inclusive teacher professionalism.
Keywords
References
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., Conboy, K., Doyle, R., Dubey, R., Dutot, V., Felix, R., Goyal, D. P., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Jebabli, I., … Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Forlin, C., Earle, C., Loreman, T., & Sharma, U. (2011). The Sentiments, Attitudes, and Concerns about Inclusive Education Revised (SACIE-R) scale for measuring pre-service teachers' perceptions about inclusion. Exceptionality Education International, 21(3), 50–65.
Gomez Paloma, F. (2014). Embodied cognitive science: Atti incarnati della didattica. Nuova Cultura.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. Macmillan.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as Another (K. Blamey, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1990)
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
Shakespeare, T. (2018). Disability: The Basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Sibilio, M. (2014). La didattica semplessa. Liguori.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v10i4.1871
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION, SPORT AND INCLUSIVE DIDACTICS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics
Publisher: Cares srl – REN Press (since 2026). Previously published by Gaia srl – Edizioni Universitarie Romane (2017–2025).
ISSN: 2532-3296 E-ISSN: 3103-5744
Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics
