AN INNOVATIVE E-TIVITY FRAMEWORK FOR AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: ACONHE PRIN PROJECT EXPERIMENT

Anna Dipace, Teresa Savoia, Ilaria Fiore

Abstract


The PRIN AcOnHE project developed an online formativeassessmentframeworkforblendedcourses.APRISMA-basedreviewon the e-tivity model (Salmon, 2002) provided the theoretical basis.E-tivities were designed at Pegaso University following a five-stagestructure with e-moderators. Preliminary results show enhancedengagement, effective formative assessment, and adaptability across disciplines.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, W. L., Krathwohl, D. R., (eds) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Armellini, A. Aiyegbayo, O. (2010). Learning design and assessment with e-tivities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 922-935.

Barrett, H. C. (2007). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of adolescent & adult literacy, 50(6), 436-449.

Brusilovsky, P., & Henze, N. (2007). Open corpus adaptive educational hypermedia. In The adaptive web: methods and strategies of web personalization (pp. 671-696). Springer.

Chick, R. C., Clifton, G. T., Peace, K. M., Propper, B. W., Hale, D. F., Alseidi, A. A., & Vreeland, T. J. (2020). Using technology to maintain the education of residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of surgical education, 77(4), 729-732.

Dipace, A., Raviolo, P., Tinterri, A., Savoia, T., Fiore, I., Emanuel, F. (in press). Ridefinire le “e-tivities”: verso un framework per la valutazione online, Atti di Convegno La formazione iniziale, in ingresso e continua del personale della scuola. Problemi di metodo, di contenuti, di gestione e di valutazione. Venezia, 4-5 ottobre 2024.

Dipace, A., Savoia, T., Fiore, I., Di Padova, M. (2025). La formazione iniziale dei docenti: il passaggio da designer a e-moderator. QTimes, XVII, 1, pp. 14-26.

Dlab, M. H., & Hoić-Božić, N. (2016). Increasing students' academic results in e- course using educational recommendation strategy. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies 2016 (pp. 391- 398).

Edisherashvili, N., Saks, K., Pedaste, M., & Leijen, Ä. (2022). Supporting self- regulated learning in distance learning contexts at higher education level: systematic literature review. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 792422.

García-Holgado, A., Nascimbeni, F., Garcia-Peñalvo, F. J., Brunton, J., Bonaudo, P., de la Higuera, C., & Burgos, D. (2020). Handbook of successful open teaching practices.

Gleason, J., & Suvorov, R. (2011). Learner perceptions of asynchronous oral computer-mediated communication tasks using Wimba Voice for developing their L2 oral proficiency. The role of CALL in hybrid and online language courses, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Hoyos, J. E. P. (2016). Designing online learning activities using the e-moderation and the e-tivity frameworks.

Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60, 433-441.

Kelly, R. (2011). Online Course Design: 13 Strategies for Teaching in a Web-based Distance Learning Environment. Faculty Focus. Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/free-reports/online-course-design-13-strategies-for- teaching-in-a-web-based-distance-learning-environment/.

Lee, L. (2011). Blogging: Promoting Learner Autonomy and Intercultural Competence Through Study Abroad. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3, SI), 87–109.

Limone, P. (2021, January). Towards a hybrid ecosystem of blended learning within university contexts. In teleXbe.

Mayes, T., Morrison, D., Mellar, H., Bullen, P., & Oliver, M. (2009). Transforming Higher Education through Technology Enhanced Learning. Transformation, Vol.

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/ourwork/learningand tech/transforming_he_through_technology_enhanced_learning.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). “Educational design research”. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 131-140). Springer New York.

Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2013). Exploring asynchronous and synchronous tool use in online courses. Computers & education, 60(1), 87-94.

Pelizzari, F., & Carenzio, A. (2024). L’e-tivity come pratica didattica evolutiva e diffusa. Un caso studio nell’ambito dell’Higher Education. GIORNALE ITALIANO DELLA RICERCA EDUCATIVA, (32), 111-123.

Raviolo, P., Dipace, A., Rondonotti, M., Savoia, T., Emanuel, F., & Fiore, I. (2024). Portfolio e e-portfolio per la valutazione formativa nell’alta formazione: evidenze dalla letteratura. COLLANA SIRD, 805-813.

Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: the key to active online learning. Routledge.

Salmon, G. (2007). 80: 20 for E-Moderators, Cms-journal, 29, pp.39-43.

Sansone, N., & Cesareni, D. (2020). E-Learning e didattica universitaria socio- costruttivista: la progettazione delle e-tivity E-Learning and socio-constructivist university teaching: designing the e-tivities. Uppado, 139.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v9i1.1416

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION, SPORT AND INCLUSIVE DIDACTICS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics 
ISSN printed: 2532-3296