EXPLORING FACULTY PERCEPTIONS TOWARD UDL AND NON-TRADITIONAL STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION. THE D.A.N.T.E.-U. PROJECT

Andrea Fiorucci, Alessia Bevilacqua, Elena Abbate

Abstract


The study, presenting the results emerging from a survey conducted at four Italian universities partner of the D.A.N.T.E.-U. network, explores the perceptions of faculty members in the Primary Education Sciences degree program with respect to non-traditional student population needs and to the degree of adherence to or divergence from UDL principles in their university teaching practices. The results show that universities struggle to meet the increasingly diverse educational needs of students and faculty members rarely adopt UDL-based teaching strategies.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bombardelli, O. (2016). Una bussola per gli studenti universitari. In Il successo formativo all’università: ostacoli e ricerca di soluzione, Università degli studi di Trento. Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia, pp. 73-87.

Canevaro, A. (2008). Pietre che affiorano: i mediatori efficaci in educazione con la logica del domino. Edizioni Erickson.

Chung E., Turnbull D., & Chur-Hansen A. (2014). Who are non-traditional students? A systematic review of published definitions in research on mental health of tertiary students. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(22), 1224-1238.

Coyne P., Pisha B., Dalton B., Zeph L. A., & Smith N. C. (2012). Literacy by design: A universal design for learning approach for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3), 162-172.

Cumming T. M., & Rose M. C. (2022). Exploring universal design for learning as an accessibility tool in higher education: A review of the current literature. The Australian Educational Researcher, 49(5), 1025-1043.

Curneen, A. (2024). Universal Design for Learning as a Two-pronged Approach to Inclusive Practice in Initial Teacher Education in Ireland. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 16(2).

Dallas, B. K., Sprong, M. E., & Kluesner, B. K. (2016). Multiuniversity comparison of faculty attitudes and use of Universal Design instructional techniques. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 30(2), 148-160.

Fiorucci A., Pinnelli S., Bevilacqua A. & Baccassino F. (2024). L’Universal Design for Learning nell’Higher Education: un modello di sviluppo per una didattica universitaria e inclusiva. Il progetto Dante-U. In Ambienti flessibili. Creatività, inclusione, ecologia, realtà e virtuale. RomaTrE-Press.

Gawronski, M., Kuk, L., & Lombardi, A. R. (2016). Inclusive instruction: Perceptions of community college faculty and students pertaining to universal design. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(4), 331-347.

LaRocco, D. J., & Wilken, D. S. (2013). Universal Design for Learning: University faculty stages of concerns and levels of use. Current Issues in Education, 16(1).

Lombardi, A., Vukovic, B., & Sala-Bars, I. (2015). International Comparisons of Inclusive Instruction among College Faculty in Spain, Canada, and the United States. Journal of postsecondary education and disability, 28(4), 447-460.

Lombardi, A. R., Murray, C., & Gerdes, H. (2011). College faculty and inclusive instruction: Self-reported attitudes and actions pertaining to Universal Design. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(4), 250-261.

Lombardi, A. R., & Murray, C. (2011). Measuring university faculty attitudes toward disability: Willingness to accommodate and adopt Universal Design principles. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34(1), 43-56.

Murawski W.W., & Scott K.L. (2021) (Eds.), Universal Design for Learning in pratica- strategie efficaci per l’apprendimento inclusivo. Trento: Erickson.

PRIN. (2022). D.A.N.T.E.-U. Design Accessibility Network to Enjoy University. Progetto finanziato dal Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca (MUR).

Raue, K., & Lewis, L. (2011). Students with Disabilities at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions. First Look. NCES 2011-018. National Center for Education Statistics.

Savia, G. (2016). Universal Design for Learning: La Progettazione Universale per l’Apprendimento per una didattica inclusiva. Edizioni Centro Studi Erickson.

Schuetze H. G., & Slowey M. (2002). Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis of non-traditional students and lifelong learners in higher education. Higher education, 44, 309-327.

Serbati, A., & Felisatti, E. (2022). Didattica universitaria e preparazione professionale dei docenti: prospettive e approcci metodologici e valutativi delle azioni di faculty development. Didattiche e didattica universitaria. Teorie, culture, pratiche alla prova del lockdown da Covid-19, 7, 155.

Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2022). Critically considering the ‘inclusive curriculum’ in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(8), 1250-1272.

UNESCO. (1998) World Declaration on Higher Education For The Twenty-First Century. Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Vision and Action, adopted by the World Conference on Higher Education, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0011/001163/116345e.pdf.

West, E. A., Novak, D., & Mueller, C. (2016). Inclusive Instruction for Students with Disabilities in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(4), 365-379.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32043/gsd.v9i2.1471

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION, SPORT AND INCLUSIVE DIDACTICS

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Italian Journal of Health Education, Sports and Inclusive Didactics 
ISSN printed: 2532-3296